[ARC5] [Milsurplus] "Throat mic" subject addendum

[MARK DORNEY]

Like I said, they sure look neat in the movies, but suck in real world use. 

Mark D. 

“In matters of style, float with the current. In matters of Principle, stand like a rock. “.   -   Thomas Jefferson 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 21, 2021, at 1:08 PM, Michael Hanz <aaf-radio-1 at aafradio.org> wrote:
> 
>  This time with the two attached PNGs
> 
>> On 2/21/2021 1:03 PM, Michael Hanz wrote:
>> On 2/20/2021 8:54 PM, Hubert Miller wrote: 
>>> So what do you think? Not understandable? 
>> 
>> Well, it might be useful to ask, as compared to what?  Are we comparing it with today's mics in a typical ham shack environment? Or in WWII combat, which is how I thought the discussion originally began?  What are the parameters of the word "understandable", and do they include any consideration other than under the relatively perfect band conditions in the Fykse recording?  Would they be understandable under typical QRM and QRN?  The boundary values aren't quite clear here. 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> <scan0030.png>
> 
> <scan0033.png>
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARC5 mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arc5
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ARC5 at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html