[ARC5] [Milsurplus] "Throat mic" subject addendum

[Michael Hanz]

This time with the two attached PNGs

On 2/21/2021 1:03 PM, Michael Hanz wrote:
> On 2/20/2021 8:54 PM, Hubert Miller wrote:
>> So what do you think? Not understandable?
>
> Well, it might be useful to ask, as compared to what?  Are we 
> comparing it with today's mics in a typical ham shack environment? Or 
> in WWII combat, which is how I thought the discussion originally 
> began?  What are the parameters of the word "understandable", and do 
> they include any consideration other than under the relatively perfect 
> band conditions in the Fykse recording?  Would they be understandable 
> under typical QRM and QRN?  The boundary values aren't quite clear here.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20210221/71158c18/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: scan0030.png
Type: image/png
Size: 119558 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20210221/71158c18/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: scan0033.png
Type: image/png
Size: 42810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/arc5/attachments/20210221/71158c18/attachment-0003.png>