[ARC5] [Milsurplus] LM Questions
Bob Camp
kb8tq at n1k.org
Mon Nov 13 12:09:41 EST 2017
Hi
When the calibration book was stamped out by the giant test set that calibrated
the frequency meter, the corrector was center scale for the entire process. The
“interesting question” is — how long did they burn in the sets before they calibrated
them? There was a war on …..
Indeed that test set is one of those items that I really wish I’d bought when I had
the chance … no money, no truck to haul it, no space to store it ….still should have
gone for it !!!!!
Bob
> On Nov 13, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Jack Antonio <scr287 at att.net> wrote:
>
> I've been playing with my LMs lately, and
> would like to compare an observation.
>
> This concerns the oorrector. I have 3 and
> they all do pretty much the same thing.
>
> At the 2000 kc checkpoint, the corrector will
> be between 4 and 5. At the 4000kc checkpoint,
> the corrector will be at 2 to 3.
>
> I'm wondering if this is pretty much normal
> for these 70+ year old instruments, or is this
> an indication of aged components or other
> problem?
>
> I am assuming that when these were brand new
> the corrector didn't change much if at all
> across the band, would this assumption be
> correct?
>
> It doesn't cause too much of a problem, all
> three of my meters do much better than the
> ..01% specified in the manual.
>
> Jack Antonio
> WA7DIA
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the ARC5
mailing list