[ARC5] that one cent command receiver - (long reply)
Leslie Smith
vk2bcu at operamail.com
Sat Apr 12 02:40:39 EDT 2014
On Fri, Apr 11, Bill Cromwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have just completed the entire transaction for the one cent 160 meter
> command receiver that was listed on the bay. [...] - Bill
Hello Bill (and others),
I looked at that set, (the R-25) and my fingers hovered over the "bid"
key for a micro-second; I'm glad I didn't bid, because I know you'll get
a lot of fun from bringing 'the beast' back to life!
Great description of the condition of the set as received!
I recently got a set similar to yours - it is a BC-946 (Colonial) and a
bit knocked around - but it can be made to go, I think, just like your
set. The detector/AF amp has been replaced by a 6H6 and a 6J5 triode
sits in the 12A6 socket. The 7 pin connector on the rear panel has been
replaced by a rather ugly and out-of-place tag-strip. I think the
heater wiring has been 'messed with'. I really do prefer the 24v
filament system; although I understand that 12 volts supplies were
easily got in the late 40's and early 50's
The B.F.O coil-box is missing in 'my' set, and I'm rather grateful to
Ken (KG) for the idea I can get a new one from Fair Radio. I'll do
that. The output transformer is missing. Ditto for the
noise-suppression choke in the B+ line.
"My" set isn't too dirty. In the past I used "Dot's bath and tile
clearner" on really dirty sets. This is a quaternary ammonium foaming
cleaner and I spray it into the set until the thing looks like it's full
of cream - like a cream bun you might buy at the bakers. Then I work on
this with a paintbrush to loosen dirt and crud. Others have described
this process, so I'll not repeat that here, except to say it seems to
work a treat.
Now I must make some interesting decisions about what I need to do to
make this set go. Since the complete deck is missing under the dyno
plate I'll cut a 3mm aluminium plate to replace that and bolt it in the
hole. If the other hole around the 7 pin connection is smaller than 1
1/8 inch (I think this is the size of an octal s ocket) I'll use an
octal socket on the rear panel for power etc.
The bottom plate is missing - and I think I've got Buckley's chance of
finding a replacement. I don't know what I'll do with that, but the
bottom plate seems to have the very important function (long term) of
keeping the under-chassis clean. I'll need a bottom plate of some
sort.
Since my set is already a junker I'm going to use it as an experimental
I.F. 'back-end'. I'll use it on 525, 715 and 1500kHz and experiment
with breakthru from the BC band. I've always wondered about BC
break-thru when the I.F. is in the middle of the BC band. (The BC-348
seems ok, so maybe it can be done.) The band-width in the '946 will be
broader than I might get from a BC-453, but even on 40m I think the
selectivity will be good enough for this beginner.
I bought a DC-DC converter from eBay (12v to B+). I can select any B+
voltage from 45 to 180 volts by changing a single resistor. I hope I
can keep the switching noise out of the '946. I plan to experiment with
the performance of the set as I vary the B+ supply. I'm certain others
have done this already, but I haven't. I'm curious to investigate the
effect of different B+ supply voltages on set performance. I'll need to
make a calibrated signal source to get an objective reading; I have an
HP 606 but I'll need to repair it. I bought the 606 as working - but
when I turned it on it took about 10 seconds before a cloud of smoke
dispensed with that illusion. Shorted caps took out a RFC in the B+
supply and gave that delicious (not) smell of burning electronics.
After that I'm going to build a front-end for my BC-946 - just the
RF/mixer/oscillator part of a simple convewrter. Nothing elaborate, but
good enought to work as the front-end of home-brew receiver on
160/80/40/20. So - I was more than interested to read about the work
needed on your 'one-cent' receiver, and your plans to make it go. My
long term goal is to use this set during the 2015 Remembrance Day (RD)
contest here in Australia. Contacts made with a genuine WWII rig earn
double points. I'm not sure if my 1/2 vintage 1/2 homebrew rig will
pass the 'genuine WWII' test.
The RD contest is a memorial to the end of WWII (the contest date is the
weekend after the end of hostilities in August) and using a 'command'
rig should be a real 'hoot'. I hear AM stations calling CQ (using
Collins gear) and the quality is really 'nice'. When I hear it - it's
like "wow"! I think I can make a T-19 sound good too! So - this is
August 2105. Doing this will keep me busy until then.
Some say home-brew is dead, but I believe this is THE age of home-brew.
Test gear is abundant and cheap. Good test gear. When I was in my
teens a 20k-ohm per volt multimeter cost 15 hours wages. Recently I
bought a meter (a real cheapie with only 1% accuracy) for about 2 hours
wages, so home-brewing is much easier now than in the 50's and 60's.
As for your set - I read your posting with great interest. Thanks for
taking the time to write. Keep us posted as your set comes to life!
73 de Les Smith
vk2bcu at operamail.com
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
http://www.fastmail.fm/help/overview_quotes.html
More information about the ARC5
mailing list