[ARC5] dB Power and QRP according to HR magazine.

Kenneth G. Gordon kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Wed Oct 30 15:16:58 EDT 2013


On 31 Oct 2013 at 5:29, Leslie Smith wrote:

> thread, and well above 1 dB.  The article drew the conclusion that
> under good conditions a 5 or 10 watt QRP transmitter may make
> effective DX contacts - and that a 100W or 400W signal might be heard
> 'better' but that QRP was still worth-while.

I have routinely worked DX on 40 meters with 15 watts (max), 
crystal-controlled, with my AN/GRC-109. The most recent was only a few 
weeks ago. It has been my experience that if I can hear them, I can generally 
work them at that power level.

In MY experience, the difference in signal levels at the RECEIVER between 
100 watts and 1KW is, most of the time, truly indiscernable.

HOWEVER, and again in my experience, QSB is often completely eliminated 
at the higher power level, while it would cause significant problems at the 
lower power level. 

I am talking about achieving 100% written copy...as in accurate traffic 
handling, not casual conversation in which much of it can be "guessed" with 
high accuracy.
 
> observation is this:  "Knowledge gained by personal effort is often of
> a better quality than knowledge gained by other means."

I most heartily agree with THAT statement, Les!!!

Ken W7EKB


More information about the ARC5 mailing list