[ARC5] Hallicrafters receivers...Collins stuff

Geoff geoffrey at jeremy.mv.com
Mon May 13 18:20:41 EDT 2013


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Morrow" <kk5f at earthlink.net>
To: <Arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ARC5] Hallicrafters receivers...Collins stuff


>
>> Collins always catered to the market for deluxe and
>> expensive equipment.
>
> Collins was even able to "coax" people into paying the
> very top dollar for radios using RCA phono plugs for
> RF coax connections (like the entire S-Line).  It still
> seems impossible to me that the KWM-2A got accepted as
> the RT-718/FRC-93.  Just because something works OK for
> USAF MARS doesn't mean it meets requirements for regular
> military field service.  Something was a bit irregular there,
> I think...maybe standards are lower for FRC gear. (Yes,
> I know it was used in tactical situations in SEA.)
>
> OTOH, there *is* something very professional about the
> KWM-1, especially one of the rare variants that had
> two aircraft-radio-style  L-clips on the front for
> fastening into the mounting rack, as seen here:
>
>  http://www.radioing.com/collins/tr02.html
>
> When the KWM-380 came out a third of a century ago, it
> was obvious that the ham/Collins game was over.  The
> contemporary Drake TR-7 series was as modern, yet far
> more attractive for ham service, IMHO.  So was the
> TS-820S.
>
> Mike / KK5F


Collins got accepted thanks to Senator Barry Goldwater and Curtis LeMay, 
both USAF Generals and very active/influential hams. Im sure Art paid the 
price of their lobbying all the way to the bank....

Collins replaced Hallicrafters at K1USA also.

Carl 



More information about the ARC5 mailing list