[ARC5] My R-25/ARC-5 and ARA CBY-46104
WA5CAB at cs.com
WA5CAB at cs.com
Sun Oct 14 15:01:29 EDT 2012
(a) I agree with Mike that the post-war history of military radios in
civilian hands is not very interesting. And have about 100 shelf feet of Command
receivers and transmitters that demonstrate the on average poor quality of
the modifications. However, I also agree that had hams or wannabe
experimenters not been buying the sets, a good percentage of which never got a round
tuit for hacking them, there wouldn't be many left for us to be arguing
about.
(b) back to the original thread, the late pre-war and early WW-II Signal
Corps ground and vehicular sets mostly came with limited frequency coverage.
For example, the official listing of tuning units in SCR-193-(*) is only
TU-5 and TU-6, together covering 1.5-4.5 MC. Of course, TU's were available
below and above that but that's what the default issue apparently was. And
there was a lot of marine (meaning ocean going vessels, not USMC) activity
below 3 MC, especially in Central and South America. plus most small craft in
North America. So my assumption is that the 1.5-3.0 MC units were for
contigency usage in cooperation with ground and naval forces still primarily
operating down there. The AAF didn't buy the receiver probably because most of
their assets were in Europe. And as a historical fact, the senior personal
running AAF and later USAF had no interest in anything but SAC like
activities anyway.
Robert D
In a message dated 10/14/2012 13:24:50 PM Central Daylight Time,
kk5f at earthlink.net writes:
> Ken wrote:
>
> >According to Gordon White's documentation, there was one of those
> >receivers for every 5 airplanes in the entire air service.
>
> I posted two days ago information from the AN/ARC-5 LF/MF/HF Components
> Maintenance Manual AN 16-30ARC5-2
> ( http://bama.edebris.com/manuals/military/an-arc5/ )
> Figure 8-55, that states:
>
> "Receiver R-25/ARC-5 is supplied to the Service in quantities of one
> for each five airplanes or one for each airplane depending upon the
> type of aircraft in which this equipment is installed."
>
> That implies more than one for each five aircraft in general service
> use for aircraft carrying AN/ARC-5 MF/HF command sets.
>
> There is yet another statement on this nine-page figure that states:
>
> "A 1.5-3.0 Mc receiver (part No. R-25/ARC-5) is supplied in quantities
> of one for each five airplanes. This unit is not installed but is held
> for the Service."
>
> That implies that anticipated usage was infrequent and contingent.
> I doubt any hard and fast one-to-five-airplane correlation to actual
> acquisition ratios of the R-25.
>
> Most R-25 units that I've seen in the past forty years have been new or
> even new-in-box, like the units that John Meshna was selling in the
> mid-1970s. Just like the R-24/ARC-5 BCB receiver, it appears that all
> these common R-25/ARC-5 receivers and their associated T-18/ARC-5
> transmitters found very little actual service use.
>
> Mike / KK5F
>
Robert & Susan Downs - Houston
wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
More information about the ARC5
mailing list