[ARC5] CW Use in Fighters
Mike Morrow
kk5f at earthlink.net
Sat Mar 24 00:14:53 EDT 2012
> I even recall seeing a aircraft radio control box with a built in
> CW key in an old issue of the Fair Radio Catalog, but did they
> actually ever plan to use that mode?
US Army HF Command Sets
SCR-A*-183/283 Receiver is VOICE(MCW) only.
(1932) Transmitter is TONE(MCW), CW, or VOICE.
(Pilot control has key.)
SCR-274-N Receiver is MCW(VOICE) or CW.
(1941) Transmitter is TONE(MCW), CW, or VOICE.
(Pilot control has key.)
US Navy HF Command Sets
RU-*/GF-* Receiver is MCW(VOICE) or CW (except earliest receiver).
(1932) Transmitter is MCW(TONE), CW, or VOICE.
(Pilot control has key.)
ARA/ATA Receiver is MCW(VOICE) or CW.
(1940) Transmitter is TONE(MCW), CW, or VOICE.
(Pilot control has key.)
ARB/ATB Receiver and Transmitter are VOICE/MCW/CW capable.
(1942) (Pilot control has key.)
AN/ARC-5 Receiver is VOICE(MCW) or CW capable, but in MOST
(1943) installations the pilot controls allowed only VOICE
(there was no VOICE/CW selector on the C-27 and C-38
controls).
Transmitter is TONE(MCW), CW, or VOICE, but in MOST
installation the pilot controls alllowed only VOICE
(the TONE/CW/VOICE selector has a cover installed
over it, and the pilot control has NO key).
> ...in CW or Tone modes the transmitter dynamotor keeps running continuously
> whereas in Voice mode it only spins up when the mike key is pressed
That's an essential arrangement in all dynamotor-supplied sets, all the way
up to the AN/ARC-38A. One doesn't want the dynamotor energizing/de-energizing
with each closure/opening of the key.
> But for the SCR-283 installation for the P-40D they point out that the
> receiver lacks a BFO so CW is not available. So if the earlier radios
> lacked the capability, why were pilots schooled in Morse Code?
The USAAC SCR-A*-183/283 sets had MCW capability on receive and transmit,
and had a key on the pilot's control.
The USN RU-*/GF-* sets, except for the earliest receiver, had CW and MCW
capability on receive and transmit, and had a key on the pilot's control.
That said, I doubt that many pilots had a real practical knowledge of
Morse beyond reading navigation beacon IDs. I had an instructor in high
school who joined the USAAC in 1937 and was a pilot for three wars.
He told me he would not have been of much service actually communicating
in Morse at any but a snail's pace. And he was pre-WWII old-school!
> But I have yet to find any written down historical cases in which pilots
> in single seat fighters used CW for two way communications.
That's because it was rarely, if ever, required. The US Navy came to that
conclusion by the time the AN/ARC-5 sets were being designed in early WWII.
In most AN/ARC-5 installations, the pilot lacked receiver and transmitter
controls for frequency, mode, and even power on/off. No key was provided
on any AN/ARC-5 transmitter control.
Though not a command set, I question the value of the AN/ART-13* pilot's
control box in USAAF AN/ARC-8 installations. The pilot had no control of
the AN/ARR-11 (BC-348-*) receiver, so what good was the C-87/ART-13 which
allowed the pilot to select channels and mode on the transmitter?
The USN's equivalent system, the AN/ARC-25, utilized the AN/ARR-15 receiver
with the AN/ART-13. A pilot's control makes sense there, such as the
C-733A/ARR-15A for the R-105*/ARR-15, and the C-740/ART-13 for the T-47/ARR-13.
However, the AN/ARR-15 can NOT be remotely switched between VOICE and CW mode.
Prior to arrival of the AN/ARR-15, the ATC or AN/ART-13 was often used
with the remote spline-tuned ARB, so even then there was some value to the
AN/ART-13 pilot control. But none of this is true for USAAF installations.
The AN/ARC-2* is an all-in-one-box HF command set that, with the loss of
importance of the HF command set, was typically employed in USN and USCG
aircraft after WWII as a baby liaison set. (It wasn't at all suited for
that.) Its pilot control has no Morse key, nor even the capability to
change emission mode.
73,
Mike / KK5F
More information about the ARC5
mailing list