[ARC5] [ARC-5radio] US 60 Meter Band Changes Approved by FCC - CW Issues
Richard Knoppow
1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com
Sun Nov 20 17:31:34 EST 2011
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn Little WB4UIV" <glennmaillist at bellsouth.net>
To: "ARC-5" <arc5 at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ARC5] [ARC-5radio] US 60 Meter Band Changes
Approved by FCC - CW Issues
> The 60 meter band was created for ECOM inter-operability.
> Its purpose was / is to allow FEMA and other agencies
> direct access
> to the amateur radio community.
> This is a government shared band.
> With this in mind, the requirements for amateur radio
> operators to
> utilize this spectrum asset, they have to conform to the
> frequency
> tolerance as imposed on government agencies by NTIA.
> This is to allow intelligible communications between
> government
> channelized equipment and amateur equipment.
>
> If you do not like the restrictions imposed, find another
> place to play.
>
> Remember, amateur radio is a service, not a hobby.
>
> 73
> Glenn
> WB4UIV
>
There is some history of the 60 meter band at:
http://www.arrl.org/60-meter-faq
There is a more complete discussion at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/60-meter_band
The NTIA web site is under construction so has less
information than the two above but does describe the purpose
of the agency and its responsibilities.
FWIW, the Department of Commerce has not regulated the
radio spectrum since the creation of the Federal Radio
Commission, later to become the FCC, c.1926.
Those who think that spectrum allocations are done
badly should have a look at the pressures on government
agencies from lobbiests representing very wealthy
corporations and the very difficult negotiations with
foreign contries regarding spectrum. I agree that things are
not as they should be but there are many factors
contributing to the problems, one should do some research
before the knee-jerk blaming of the U.S. government.
Certainly denigrating language ("what planet are you from?"
etc) is no substitute for valid argument.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickburk at ix.netcom.com
More information about the ARC5
mailing list