[ARC5] Nomenclature Taxonomy
WA5CAB at cs.com
WA5CAB at cs.com
Fri Jun 24 23:41:30 EDT 2011
Actually, those aren't inconsistencies (paragraph 7 below) as I understand
the system. As best I can tell (I have never come across the rules
document), the rule in the AN system was basically about backward and forward
compatibility. In the case of the T-47A, it had no significant capability that
the T-47 didn't (in fact, it has less, as it does not cover 600-1500 KC). As
with the AN/GRC-9, the "A" in AN/ART-13A indicates other differences
between the two sets.
In the case of T-412/ART-13B, however, there was a significant difference
in capability (the crystal oscillator). So not only the component
nomenclature but also the set nomenclature was changed or incremented.
Plus I have to add that a T-47A with an installed CDA-T is not a DOD or
USAF modified unit. USAF modified units got a T-412 nameplate. Those units
without the T-412 nameplate were done by a contractor for Pan American or
done by some other non-DOD activity (including hams with the mod kit). Same
applies to T-47's and COL-52286's with CDA-T installed.
In a message dated 6/23/2011 2:55:49 PM Central Daylight Time,
kk5f at earthlink.net writes:
> Robert wrote:
>
> >Error. I have some steel LG-2-A that are stamped LG-2A.. Probably the
> >last ones made before the aluminum LG-2-B came out.
>
> I agree with Robert. There is tangible value to use of the correct format
> or taxonomy for the system applicable to the particular equipment.
>
> In the old Army nomenclature system of Robert's example, that means that
> LG2A,
> LG2-A, and LG-2A are incorrect component IDs for the LG-2-A. For system
> IDs
> like SCR-274-N as well, SCR274N or SCR-274N are incorrect.
>
> In the old Navy nomenclature system, it's RAL-3, ZB-2, and TCS-12, not
> RAL3,
> ZB2, or TCS12. It's CBY-46105 for that RAV and ARA compnent, not
> CBY46105.
>
> The JAN system has room for many errors. For the R-23A/ARC-5, the use of
> R23A/ARC5, R 23A/ARC 5, R-23-A/ARC-5, or ARC-5/R-23A are ALL a few
> examples
> of incorrect usage.
>
> Even manufacturers make careless mistakes. Hughes used RT-794-B/PRC-74
> on the name plate of the RT-794B/PRC-74. Oklahoma Aerotronics misspelled
> RECEIVER as RECIEVER on the R-1004A/GRC-109 name plate. There are others.
>
> Then, there are subtle inconsistencies in the JAN system. The
> R-1004A/GRC-109
> is part of the AN/GRC-109A, the RT-794B/PRC-74 is part of the AN/PRC-74B,
> and
> the T-47A/ART-13 is part of the AN/ART-13A. However, AN/ART-13B applies
> to
> both the system using the T-47A/ART-13 with CDA-T LF/MF/HF crystal
> oscillator
> AND the system using the T-412/ART-13B. The RT-77A/GRC-9 is not
> necessarily
> part of the AN/GRC-9A. The AN/GRC-9A means only that a DY-88/GRC-9 power
> unit
> is being used in a system which can have either a RT-77 or RT-77A/GRC-9 as
> the
> main unit.
>
> There's those Collins commercial model numbers too, some used without
> change
> by the military. The USAF 618S-1 is correct, not 618-S1 or 618S1.
>
> We could get into aircraft nomenclature, like the one the Navy used before
> the
> services standardized in 1962. PB4Y-2 is correct, not PB-4Y2 or PB4-Y2 or
> PB4Y2. For the USAAF and the current common system, B-29A is correct, not
> B29A
> or B-29-A.
>
> And then there's firearms. Who wants to address M-1911A-1 vs. M1911A-1
> vs.
> M1911A1?
>
> And foreign nomenclature! Wireless Set Number 19 Mark II, or Wireless Set
> No. 19 Mk. 2, or W.S. 19 Mk II, or WS19MkII, or many many other variations
> for the exact same set. This one of many UK examples is horrific simply
> for how difficult it is to determine THE actual *correct* nomenclature,
> especially for a complete and unambiguous database search.
>
> It would make internet equipment searches much easier and productive had
> all
> the databases and websites simply used the defined taxonomy that applies
> to
> the equipment of interest. To deliberately do otherwise is an impediment.
>
> Mike / KK5F
>
Robert & Susan Downs - Houston
wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
More information about the ARC5
mailing list