[ARC5] Interesting occurrence...
mac
w7qho at aol.com
Sat Apr 2 13:15:14 EDT 2011
Yep, the 5963 (for ex.) is just such a premium version of the 12AU7.
One of my first projects as a new engineer back in the 50's included
hundreds of 5963s in "flip-flop" and other switching circuits. Only
failure mode I remember with these tubes were a (very) few instances
of heater to cathode leakage.
Dennis D. W7QHO
Glendale, CA
*********
On Apr 2, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Dennis Monticelli wrote:
> Regarding leaving on filament without applied B+, there are some
> lessons
> from early vacuum tube computer circuits. In binary logic
> operations a tube
> could spend a great deal of time sitting at either an ON or OFF
> state. It
> was found that tubes were failing bofore their expected MTBF and that
> problelm was traced to tubes that had been in the OFF state for an
> extended
> period. This premature failure was nick-named "sleeping sickness"
> but is
> more correctly termed "cathode interface resistance." The mechanism
> is the
> formation of an interface layer between the nickel cylinder (in an
> indirectly heated cathode) and the active oxide coating. The series
> resistance of this layer reduces the gm. The work-around is to run
> a little
> plate current during the "idle" state or better yet use a tube
> purpose built
> for the job. There are tubes in the premium industrial series of
> minatures
> that are specifically rated for computer use. These types are
> virtually
> immume to the formation of the problematic interface layer.
>
> In view of this known problem it wouldn't seem to be a good idea to
> run
> indirectly heated filaments over extended time periods without some
> trickle
> plate current.
More information about the ARC5
mailing list