[ARC5] Re: [Milsurplus] C-405A/A vs. C-740/ART-13
Gordon White
gewhite at crosslink.net
Thu Sep 20 08:45:19 EDT 2007
In the 1930s, with pennies at stake compared to today, a lot of choices
were worked out over a couple of Scotches and cigars between folks like
Hap Arnold and the president of A.R.C. (or, in other cases, GE, Collins)
in a way that today would get them tossed into prison. That was
actually to the benefit of the services. On the first Command Set, the
SCR-183 predecessors, Western Electric's bid was thrown out as
"unresponsive" versus A.R.C.'s bid. On the other hand, the Air Corps
went for quite a while with the, was it the Westinghouse SCR-141? (I
forget the numbers right now) probably because of "influence" When that
supposedly superior set - on paper it was - turned out to be the size of
a foot locker and would not go in fighters of the day, of course the
Army had to scramble around and adopt the Navy's ATA/ARA as SCR-274-N
(for Navy.)
I have watched defense procurement in Washington for a career. It is
certainly political. And all the added rules to keep it legit (?) have
driven defense contracting into the stratosphere.
- Gordon White
More information about the ARC5
mailing list