[ARC5] Re: ARC5 Digest, Vol 15, Issue 33
Tom Norris
r390a at bellsouth.net
Sat Apr 30 12:35:53 EDT 2005
Just for fun, we need to find a dynamotor that
we don't really need and that has the seals and
tag. Box the dyno up and send to Sigma Tek with
a letter explaining that it has been operated the
recommended 500 hours and you are sending the
unit to them for inspection. Then place bets on
whether they have any idea what a dynamotor is.
(Sigma Tek bought ARC in 1987) hehe
Tom NU4G
>
>There's an MD-7 being offered over on the 'Bay.
>The sealed dyno on it has a tag which reads:
>
> "This dynamotor unit has been sealed after special
> mechanical inspection and electrical tests and should
> operate without attention during the first 500 hours.
> Unsatisfactory dynamotors should be returned to
> Aircraft Radio Corporation, Boonton, N.J.,
> with seals unbroken, for engineering inspection
> and replacement."
>
>I'd seen this tag before but forgotten it.
>To my mind, this lends weight to Brian's theory
>that A.R.C. sealed the dynos to prevent "green"
>flight line radio techs from needlessly opening
>the bearings, over-lubricating them and losing
>or mis-replacing the spacing shims.
>
>Dave S.
More information about the ARC5
mailing list