[Antennas] Re: [ARLHS] To Ground or Not To Ground - That is the Question

Ted Sarah - W8TTS w8tts at neo.rr.com
Sat Oct 29 05:26:30 EDT 2005


Hi Jim,

I don't have an answer for you, but this might be a good question for 
the Antenna Reflector (antennas at mailman.qth.net)
You can join it at: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas

Ted


Jim Buffington wrote:
> Visit the ARLHS online ship's store:
> http://cafepress.com/arlhs
> _________________________
> 
> For several years I have used a Hamstick mobile when activating lighthouses,
> as well as portable operation with a Buddipole.  The Hamstick was mounted on
> top of my vehicle with a magnetic mount, which was grounded to the roof, and
> the rig inside was grounded to the chassis.
> 
> Recently, I have noticed that when using either a Hamstick or Valor AB5T,
> mounted as above, the SWR is lower when the rig is grounded and the antenna
> is NOT ... and, for that matter, the rig works fine with no ground at either
> end.
> 
> This defies logic, and I would appreciate some input from others who use
> mobile antennas, particularly with magnetic mounts. 
> 
> For that matter, has anyone operated stationary mobile and driven a rod into
> the ground in order to obtain an earth ground.
> 
> Comments from any of you regarding this will be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Jim Buffington, K5JIM
> ARLHS #150
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ARLHS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/arlhs
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:ARLHS at mailman.qth.net
> 
> 

-- 
Outgoing mail not scanned because I'd lie about it if I
was a virus sending this anyway.


More information about the Antennas mailing list