[Antennas] Vertical

[Mike Michon]

Hello Sean,

On 160 meters I used a "zepp" antenna, end fed long wire at 90 feet about
225 feet long.  I put up an inverted L antenna about 70 feet vertical and 70
feet horizontal with 15 radials of varying lengths (40 feet to 130 feet).
The inverted L consistently worked better than the horizontal antenna on 80
meters and 160 meters.  I had both antennas up at the same time and used an
antenna switch to compare them.

Mike
AB5XP 

-----Original Message-----
From: antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:antennas-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of w8okn at charter.net
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 11:36 PM
To: antennas at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Antennas] Vertical

Thanks for the replies.  They were very helpful!

Now, for those who may have gone from a 25 foot dipole to a vertical, does
it REALLY help with getting more DX or is it more theoretical.

Sean
W8OKN



> I am strongly considering putting up a 30 foot vertical with an 
> automatic antenna tuner at the base.  My plan is to lay as many radials as
possible.
> Instead of just throwing a wire up into a tree, I'd like to support 
> this antenna with PVC pipe.
>
> First, what affect will the PVC have on the vertical; loss, etc.
>
> Has anyone used this idea and if so, I plan to top load the antenna to 
> improve efficiency.  Is there any risk in having too high a voltage at 
> the end of the coil at the top?
>
> Sean
> W8OKN
> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>
______________________________________________________________
Antennas mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net