[Antennas] 40m mobile antenna e.r.p. compared

[Sam Morgan]

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:47:21 -0500
"CBoone" <CBoone at earthlink.net> wrote:

> I got a reply from Sam off the list...seems he did a big NONO and told the
> landlord FCC rules prohibits the landlord from preventing ham
> antennas.....WHOA!!! That in INCORRECT bigtime!!!

ok if we are going to get into a quoting thing here...
what CBoone mis-stated was my comment that 
the landlord could not 
"say no to any and all antennas" 
there was no mention of the word H A M
this was not specifically in reference to either HAM or renter accessable 
property!

-------------------
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has rules about restrictions
on the placement of consumer-owned satellite dishes and other types of
antennas (Over-the-Air-Reception Devices or “OTARD” Rules).

FCC rules prohibit local governments, landlords, community associations,
or similar groups from restricting a resident from installing and using
an antenna that is covered under the OTARD rules. These rules only apply
to properties or areas of properties that the antenna user owns, leases
or rents and areas where the user has exclusive use or control.
--------------------

did I goof up in my approach
yes
did I mis-state what happened
perhaps
did I do what I was just accused of
no

hopefully that will set the record straight
if not ..
 
I guess this is the start of a *issing contest rather than a discussion
on antennas

I hope the former not the latter will be the case!

  

God Bless,
Sam Morgan

--
Linux _ the lifetime learning experience.
  

Sam Morgan
KA5OAI
mailto:ka5oai at qsl.net