[Antennas] Re: NEC-LIST: Copper oxide.
Chris BONDE
[email protected]
Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:47:15 -0800
I think that the corrosion rate depends upon the difference in the electromotive force
between the specific metal and its environment. Dr Barry Ornitz commented on
the galvanic series of corrosion on one the the reflectors that I am on.
So I would look at the aluminum and copper first, are they alloys (more than likely)
not pure metals and what was the other substance near to and what was between
them. Aluminum and zinc have long been used as sacrificial anodes to prevent
corrosion. Copper alloys have long been used to withstand corrosion. So more info
is needed.
Chris opr VE7HCB
To: [email protected]
From: Dan Richardson <[email protected]>
Subject: [Antennas] Re: NEC-LIST: Copper oxide.
Date sent: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:50:45 -0800
At 06:01 AM 1/12/2004, Doug wrote:
>A point about aluminum; it corrodes a lot more slowly than
>copper.
I don't think so. Up here, near the sea, on the northern California
coast aluminum's life outside, exposed to the weather, is very short
where, on the other hand, copper flashings and the like last a very
long time.
Danny, K6MHE
- - -
Your moderator for this list is:
Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Antennas mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas