[Antennas] Some thoughts on baluns

Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:47:35 -0700

You only need to call the FCC to get a new certificate.  There is even a
company that will do the search for you, for a fee, if you can't remember
exactly when you held your old Novice license, way back when!  That's all
you need to prove that you are eligible for upgrades now.  Even your name
and old call sign in an old call book is sufficient!
73's de Jerry K�EJF

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:38:47 -0500 "A10382" <[email protected]> writes:
> T+ users can operate on a small portion of 80M (CW only), 40M (CW 
> only), 15M
> (CW only) , and 10M (CW/RTTY/Data and Phone).
> 
> The FCC created a problem when they stop posting the "+" on their 
> license
> file - now making it impossible to distinguish between Tech and Tech 
> plus on
> the license file system.  Techs who pass the 5wpm need to keep the
> certificate and show it in order to be eligible for higher license 
> levels.
> The FCC relies on the VEC to verify the code test....
> 
> Loosing the certificate may mean having to take the code test 
> again.....
> 
> Many folks who passed the code tests years ago (even at 13wpm), 
> would sweat
> reading 100% accuracy for 1 minute on the 5wpm test....
> 
> 73
> Frank
> 
> 
>  ._._.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Kinyon - W7TS" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>; "'Sandy and Kees Talen'"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:23 PM
> Subject: RE: [Antennas] Some thoughts on baluns
> 
> 
> > Hi Sandy and all,
> > I am confused by your statements regarding your friend.  If he is 
> truly a
> no
> > code Tech, can he operated in the Novice HF bands?  It is my 
> understanding
> > that he can not.  If he has the 5 WPM code test (Tech +) I don't 
> think he
> > needs to pass anymore code tests to upgrade all the way to extra.  
> Someone
> > please clarify this for me.
> > Regards,
> > Ken W7TS
> >
> > -------------------
> > Kenneth E.  Kinyon
> > 34 Princeton Circle
> > Longmont, CO 80503-2106
> > Voice: (303) 684-0037
> > Fax:  (303) 776-5088
> > E-mail: [email protected]
> >   [email protected]
> >   [email protected]
> > ALPCA #8339
> > ARRL-LM
> > -------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of John Burch
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12:56
> > To: [email protected]; Sandy and Kees Talen
> > Subject: Re: [Antennas] Some thoughts on baluns
> >
> >
> > Sandy - how very timely!
> >
> > One of the local no-coders who shows lots of promise
> > of becoming a top-notch HF operator has purchased
> > himself a "short" G5RV for his station.  His intention
> > is to haunt the novice bands and work CW to gain
> > proficiency and eventually enough familiarity to upgrade
> > his ticket.
> >
> > I think this is great, and have volunteered to help him
> > where I can.
> >
> > Sandy's message regarding baluns is very timely as I
> > was asked last night by the new op if he should consider
> > a balun at the junction of the bottom of the twinlead
> > "feeder" portion of his G5RV, and the RG8 that he needs
> > to run from that point into where his HF station is set up.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks to Sandy and the rest of you for your thoughts
> > on this.
> >
> > 73 de John
> > ..
> >
> >
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Antennas mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> Outgoing email Certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.435 / Virus Database: 244 - Release Date: 12/30/02
> 
> - - - 
> 
> Your moderator for this list is:
> Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> 
> 

E. Jerold (Jerry) Forwood