[AMRadio] "Real" AM'er

[Jack Dayton]

Wow, This is just great...Ellen you shouldn't have to copy anything that offends you No...
But as this is supposed to be the AM Reflector it has now become the attack Timmy Reflector
My thanks once again goes to Pete what a guy....you schmuck....you created this you bum..


Ellen have you taken in some 10 meter am work..?..I hope so,... I worked Rome Italy on my 

Johnson Messenger I and he was 5x9...clean copy...I hope to copy your signal sometime..:-)

Have a Nice Sunday Afternoon Kid..

73
Jack
KA3ZLR


________________________________
 From: Ellen Rugowski <ellengtrgrl at dslextreme.com>
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service <amradio at mailman.qth.net> 
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] "Real" AM'er
 
Sorry Jack, but I beg to differ,

To me, and a lot of people, it sounds like juvenile toilet behavior.  I 
like AM, but one of the biggest beefs I have, is all the venom I've 
gotten (and Mark, K3MSB has also gotten), for being a contester, or 
doing "slopbucket," while it's OK for make an effort, to fart, belch, 
etc. on the air.  It's OK, for for guys like Tim, to talk about how they 
got so stoned on a great bag of weed back in the 70s (hearing that QSO 
on 3885 a couple of years ago, raised my eyebrows and them some).  It 
seems hypocritical in a way.  AMers are supposed to be classy, not 
trashy.  Other than the Saturday morning AM traders net on 3885, it 
makes me want to keep to 160, or the high bands for AM.  Don't you want 
to make a good impression on noobs?

With one of her rare posts,
Ellen-AF9J


On 11/27/2011 5:51 AM, Jack Dayton wrote:
> Well done Ed,
>
> Nothing like a coupla good belches and a good fucking to round out a qso
> at the AM Bar and Grill..... :-)
>
> 73
> JACK
> KA3ZLR
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>   From: Ed Sieb<esieb at sympatico.ca>
> To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 2:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] "Real" AM'er
>
> Back in 1996 or so, I recorded Tim with his SBE. It can  be  heard here:
> http://amfone.net/index.php?ind=media&op=file_view&iden=226
>
> During the recording, I switched over to FM, and didn't notice any difference. This occurs
> about 1:51 minutes or so.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Ed, VA3ES
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Raper wrote:
> A friend said he heard me in Iowa on mine, but I sounded better when he listened in the FM
> Mode rather than the AM Mode. LOL
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>

______________________________________________________________
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html