[AMRadio] BC-610

[rbethman]

Yep!  Plus the fact that THERE IS NO ROOM in the BC-610 for one!

Bob - N0DGN

On 11/21/2011 1:15 PM, John Coleman wrote:
> Using a modulation reactor will indeed almost eliminate the talkback and
> improve the audio.  But it's not a cheap solution and it is more heavy
> metal.
> John, WA5BXO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:amradio-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Rob Atkinson
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 5:41 AM
> To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] BC-610
>
> This is probably not a workable solution but I wonder if the talk back
> can be lessened or eliminated by using a mod reactor.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|               AM Amateur Radio Operator    NØDGN                 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|               http://home.comcast.net/~rbethman/                 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bob Bethman                \\\|///     " The absence of a danger |
|                           \\ ~ ~ //      signal does *NOT* mean  |
| rbethman at comcast.net      (/ @ @ /)      that everything is OK " |
+----------------------o00o---°(_)°---o00o-------------------------+