[AMRadio] Ebs Test failure

[BILL GUYGER]

It would be convenient if there was an audio codec for dsl because you can get 
dsl pretty much anywhere, but there isn't. We use ISDN for a lot of remote 
broadcast applications especially at sports events. There are ISDN circuits just 
for radio broadcasts in all NBA, NHL, MLB, and NFL facilities and we install 
lines at places where we are going to be doing repeated remote shows because 
it's easier than rolling a truck or van with RPU equipment but ISDN is going by 
the way sooner rather than later, it's already impossible to order new circuits 
in many places.

IP audio is where things are going and there are some nice broadcast specific IP 
codecs but there are still some issues like latency and being caught behind 
firewalls in facilities where you don't have access to be able to tell the 
firewall to pass your stream like hotels or convention centers for example. 

Our new studio facility is going to be all IP (or Telos-Axia's version of it) 
and all phones are VoIP. I think we have 18 T1's coming in 7 of which are bonded 
together to give the bandwidth for the phone system.

Bill




________________________________
From: Brett Gazdzinski <Brett.Gazdzinski at verizon.net>
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Fri, November 11, 2011 10:45:13 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Ebs Test failure

Now, you just get a dsl line and put whatever you want on it I suppose.

Brett
N2DTS




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Raper" <kj4hyd at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" 
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Ebs Test failure


>
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:38 AM, James M. Walker wrote:
>
>> Do you guys have any idea how hard it is to get a "TELEPHONE LINE" into 
>> ur
>> home these days.
>
> You should TRY to get those morons to understand you want a 15KC Equalized 
> Line!
>
> 73,
> Kevin Raper
> KJ4HYD
> CE WCKI WQIZ WLTQ
>
> There is no limitation to the fidelity of AM radio. From a mathematical 
> standpoint, AM does better in frequency response than FM. - Leonard Kahn
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

______________________________________________________________
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html