[AMRadio] RM-11306 COMMENTS TALLY!

[KB2WIG at twcny.rr.com]

So this means that 99.9% supported the ARRL proposal?

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Markavage <manualman at juno.com>
Date: Sunday, February 19, 2006 1:01 pm
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RM-11306 COMMENTS TALLY!
To: amradio at mailman.qth.net
Cc: BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV, glowbugs at piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu

> I wonder what the other 550,000 U. S. amateurs, who didn't 
> respond, 
> think about it. As of 2/12/06, 658,883 U. S. amateurs. Using Paul's
> numbers (695 against) indicates approx. .1% of the entire amateur
> population.
> 
> Pete, wa2cwa
> 
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:10:20 -0500 "Brian Carling" 
> <bcarling at cfl.rr.com>writes:
> > Look slike this ARRL Absurdity may be dead in the water if the 
> > FCC has an ounce of integrity left in them!
> > 
> > K2ORC Reports:
> > 
> > As of 1530 ET February 7, 2006 
> > 
> > No doubt due to a backlog since there was quite a flurry of 
> filing 
> > activity in the final 24 hours, comments dated Feb. 6 have 
> > appeared today on the FCC's ECFS site.  Our count will stop when 
> > the last 2/6/06 comment is filed.   
> > 
> >                                              FOR     AGAINST
> > RM-11305 (CTT petition)        44              244
> > 
> > RM-11306 (ARRL petition)      143             695
> ______________________________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
>