Peter Markavage wrote: >I wonder what the other 550,000 U. S. amateurs, who didn't respond, >think about it. As of 2/12/06, 658,883 U. S. amateurs. Using Paul's >numbers (695 against) indicates approx. .1% of the entire amateur >population. > >Pete, wa2cwa > I thought we were through discussing it in -this- forum?