[AMRadio] Re: WRL Globe King Remarks

[Bill Russell]

At 05:37 PM 4/28/02 -0700, you wrote:
>When all someone has to say is "an duh" and "you know,"  then it doesn't
>take much more than a Knight T-150 to feel comfortable.  One doesn't need
>much of a receiver, either, since the topic of conversation is already
>known.
>
>Wait a minute, I need to, an duh, tune up my rig a little, you know.  Yea,
>real fine there, you know.  Well, an duh, I had better be goin, now, you
>know.  Yer signals are real good.  Yea, real fine, you know.  Well, I don't
>know who's in here, so I'll just kinda turn it over to whoever is supposed
>to pick it up.  Go ahead, there, real find.
>
>Bill

(snip)
Sounds like a most of the SSB conversations I am unfortunate  enough to 
stumble across.
I think most of those ssb rice boxes should come with some sort of script 
to help with an intelligent conversation!!!!!!!!
Bill KC2IFR
(snip)




>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Darrell & Kay Brooks" <wa5vgo at earthlink.net>
>To: "WILHITE, JIM" <w5jpwilhite at msn.com>; "AM Radio Discussion list"
><AMRadio at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 5:07 PM
>Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: WRL Globe King Remarks
>
>
> > I guess the thing about this thread that has amazed me the most is the
> > number of guys who feel that am operation is only about audio fidelity and
> > rock crushing components. I just don't get it. I just enjoy the mode for
> > what it is, and frankly, prefer the sound of good communications audio
> > (stock ranger, 32V, etc.) over that of so called broadcast audio. I'm
> > clearly in the minority.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Darrell, WA5VGO
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMRadio mailing list
>AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio

Bill Russell