[AMRadio] Re: WRL Globe King Remarks

[Bill Smith]

When all someone has to say is "an duh" and "you know,"  then it doesn't
take much more than a Knight T-150 to feel comfortable.  One doesn't need
much of a receiver, either, since the topic of conversation is already
known.

Wait a minute, I need to, an duh, tune up my rig a little, you know.  Yea,
real fine there, you know.  Well, an duh, I had better be goin, now, you
know.  Yer signals are real good.  Yea, real fine, you know.  Well, I don't
know who's in here, so I'll just kinda turn it over to whoever is supposed
to pick it up.  Go ahead, there, real find.

Bill

----- Original Message -----
From: "Darrell & Kay Brooks" <wa5vgo at earthlink.net>
To: "WILHITE, JIM" <w5jpwilhite at msn.com>; "AM Radio Discussion list"
<AMRadio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: WRL Globe King Remarks


> I guess the thing about this thread that has amazed me the most is the
> number of guys who feel that am operation is only about audio fidelity and
> rock crushing components. I just don't get it. I just enjoy the mode for
> what it is, and frankly, prefer the sound of good communications audio
> (stock ranger, 32V, etc.) over that of so called broadcast audio. I'm
> clearly in the minority.
>
> Regards,
> Darrell, WA5VGO
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio