[600MRG] Dedicated WSQcall dial frequency?

[Brian Pease]

Then I guess will park my rig on this frequency when I am not using it 
for something else.

On 3/28/2018 8:47 PM, John Langridge wrote:
> I would say that the objection from my perspective might be that many 
> of us operate CW in that area.  I don't think there is a problem 
> putting a *dial freq* on 474.5 with the tone freqs up around 476. 
> W0YSE is doing that now and when/if I fool with WSQ I will likely do 
> the same.
>
> I think you also have to be mindful of the JT9 activity which has also 
> stablished itself just north of 474.5.
>
> 73!
>
> John KB5NJD..
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Brian Pease <bpease2 at myfairpoint.net 
> <mailto:bpease2 at myfairpoint.net>> wrote:
>
>     Might 474.5kHz become the standard calling/sounding frequency for
>     WSQcall in our region, with QSOs taking place 100 or maybe 200Hz
>     either side?
>     With a stable frequency, there might be more activity.  V1.2 has
>     just been released.
>     Another thought is to have the developers shift the audio tones up
>     by 300Hz to allow the standard 474.2kHz dial frequency with other
>     software running.  And if the software allowed you to shift
>     precisely 100Hz up or down from the default calling frequency at
>     the push of a button to continue a QSO, wouldn't that be sweet?
>     ______________________________________________________________
>     600MRG mailing list
>     Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
>     <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg>
>     Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>     <http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm>
>     Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net <mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net>
>
>     This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>     Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/600mrg/attachments/20180328/bf40e735/attachment.html>