[600MRG] 47CFR Part5 Renewals

Tue Apr 17 13:54:00 EDT 2018

Doug K4LY wrote:

>it was evident to me (I kept very good SNR of stations for 2 years) that some continued 
>to run the same illegal power, well above 5W EIRP that they used 
>legally as experimental stations on 630M.  

Are you basing this accusation on a comparison of signal strengths during experimental operations versus those under amateur regulations?  If so, I think you are overlooking one important point:  Some (perhaps many?) applied for and received higher ERP limits on their experimental license than the power they ever actually used.  

For example, my experimental license had a maximum ERP of 20 watts.  But the power I actually ran was 1 watt EIRP (estimated using my transmitter power output and antenna characteristics using several online calculators).  I've continued using the same setup under amateur operations.

Stations observing my signal strength over time would see no change due to the switch from experimental to amateur callsign.

Steve WD8DAS

sbjohnston at aol.com
http://www.wd8das.net/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Radio is your best entertainment value.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Allen <dougk4ly at gmail.com>
To: Frank Lotito <k3dz at live.com>
Cc: 600 / 630 meter research group <600mrg at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Mon, Apr 16, 2018 7:45 pm
Subject: Re: [600MRG] 47CFR Part5 Renewals

My 2 year experimental license expired just after we got the 630M and 2200M bands which I had looked forward to for those two years.  However, just a few weeks into using our two new ham bands it was evident to me (I kept very good SNR of stations for 2 years) that some continued to run the same illegal power, well above 5W EIRP that they used legally as experimental stations on 630M.  I'm no straight arrow, but as a life long QRPer, one thing important to me is the integrity of QRP and indicating honestly what you're running, so I went QRT on 630M and mostly on 2200M too.  I'm considering applying again for an experimental license because I love antenna experimentation and propagation studies and would like to operate again, maybe using higher power than the 5W EIRP.  Can we also apply for other frequencies like 75 kHz?

Doug K4LY 

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Frank Lotito <k3dz at live.com> wrote:

I'm looking for advice on renewing my 47CFR5 experimental license - I am quite sure many of you with a 47CFR5 experimental license granting one or more frequency assignments below the standard AM broadcast band have asked the same question.
..
I have had my 47CFR5 license for around 3 and a half years.  (It is on its second 2-year renewal.)  Since  47CFR97 formally established the 2200 and 630 meter amateur radio bands, what would be the advantage of reapplying for a renewal?  My grant covers only the 630 and 600 meter bands.  I did not apply for other frequency assignments either for the initial application, or for the follow-up renewal.
..
73 Frank Lotito  K3DZ / WH2XHA  

______________________________________________________________
600MRG mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
600MRG mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/600mrg/attachments/20180417/afcca499/attachment.html>