[50mhz] Re: QSL's

[John AA5JG]

How is the electronic QSLs the 21st century?  And what is wrong with paper QSLs?  Most of the important documents I get from work, the government, etc are still on paper, not in electronic format.  One thing that annoys me is this attitude that just because something is new, it must be better than the way we did things before.  I like paper QSLs for several reasons, and will continue to send and reply to them.  

If eQSL or the ARRL develops a way for me to load my paper logs into their database, I might use it.

73s John AA5JG


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "TR, WB6TMY" <tr at radions.net>
Date:  Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:45:56 +0000

>Dear John and List,
>
>I stand corrected.
>
>Thanks for setting me straight.  I hope others are aware of this.  I 
>guess ARRL hasn't joined the 21st Century and guys need to give them a clue.
>
>My apologies to all!
>
>TR, WB6TMY
>
>At 11:37 9/28/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>>Really?  I can think of plenty of awards (including several by the 
>>ARRL) which LOTW won't count for.
>>
>>73s John AA5JG
>>
>>
>>---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>>From: "TR, WB6TMY" <tr at radions.net>
>>Date:  Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:35:36 +0000
>>
>> >You>If you want credit for awards LOTW is the Log Book of the World
>> >sponsered by ARRL.  It is fully set up for awards and contacts "count."
>> >
>>
>>
>>________________________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Tel: . . . 707-832-4304  
>
>Moderator: Ray Brown, KB0STN
>_______________________________________________
>50mhz mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/50mhz
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
>Post: mailto:50mhz at mailman.qth.net
>
 

________________________________________________________________