[50mhz] Re: QSL's

[John Geiger]

Eqsls aren't worth the electrons they are printed on.

73s John AA5JG

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Montano" <n9vmo at comcast.net>
To: <50mhz at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 4:39 AM
Subject: RE: [50mhz] Re: QSL's


> I didn't think that eQSL.com (or what ever they call it) was acceptable
for
> DXCC/VUCC/WAS/WAC confirmation.
>
> Has this changed and if so, can you please point me in the right direction
> to the proper documentation showing that this is in fact the case.
>
> N9VMO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 50mhz-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:50mhz-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On Behalf Of TR, WB6TMY
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 21:39
> To: 50mhz at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [50mhz] Re: QSL's
>
> Guys,
>
> My two cents.
>
> I have shoe boxes full of QSL's and hours and dollars spent on them.
>
> I have joined the 21st century and I ONLY QSL via eQSL.cc and
> LOTW.  I don't reply to printed posted paper - it's in the waste can
> before it is opened.
>
> I just can't understand why anyone doesn't do this the modern way.
>
> TR, WB6TMY
> Tel: . . . 707-832-4304
>
> Moderator: Ray Brown, KB0STN
> _______________________________________________
> 50mhz mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/50mhz
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:50mhz at mailman.qth.net
>