[50mhz] Re: QSL's

[Joe Montano]

I didn't think that eQSL.com (or what ever they call it) was acceptable for
DXCC/VUCC/WAS/WAC confirmation.  

Has this changed and if so, can you please point me in the right direction
to the proper documentation showing that this is in fact the case.

N9VMO

-----Original Message-----
From: 50mhz-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:50mhz-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of TR, WB6TMY
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 21:39
To: 50mhz at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [50mhz] Re: QSL's

Guys,

My two cents.

I have shoe boxes full of QSL's and hours and dollars spent on them.

I have joined the 21st century and I ONLY QSL via eQSL.cc and 
LOTW.  I don't reply to printed posted paper - it's in the waste can 
before it is opened.

I just can't understand why anyone doesn't do this the modern way.

TR, WB6TMY
Tel: . . . 707-832-4304