[50mhz] New Repeater ?

Michael Urich [email protected]
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 14:59:02 -0700 (PDT)


So yeah, it's still done out there. Shame on the repeater coordinators that let something like that slide by.
 
 
Mike wrote
 
Its my understanding that "simplex" links that are tied to repeaters are
 
One, not under the jurisdiction of a repeater coordinating committee
 
Two, if properly set up and ID-ing not a violation of FCC rules.
 
Personally I like the idea of a 6 meter remote base tied to a local repeater.  They should probally be moved off of 52.525 but the idea is good.  I've worked several people on 6 who were sitting in their backyard using a HT on 440 MHz.
 
We need MORE activity on 6, not less.
 
YMMV (your milage may vary)
 
Mike
 
 
 

 

 


 
 
 

 

 




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---