[222mhz] SSB 222.100 MHz

[Eric S. Hvozda]

Very please with the performance of my IC-706mkI and DEM 222 transverter...

73
N3YMY

On Oct 30, 2011, at 1:49 PM, "Allen Oldfield" <aoldfiel at stny.rr.com> wrote:

> The transverter, paired with a reasonably current IF transceiver will
> probably outperform one of these older rigs with 222MHz.  
> I've used a FT-736 on 2M and 432.  I currently use an FT-847 for these bands
> and the 847 with an older DEMI transverter for 222MHz.  No surprise, the 847
> outperforms the 736.
> Al - W9KXI
> 
> Compared to the cost of the available 222 all mode radios, the cost of a
> transverter is pretty insignificant.
> 
> Danny Pease
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <g369n849j at weather.net>
> Date: Sun, Oct 30, 2011 11:01 am
> Subject: [222mhz] SSB 222.100 MHz
> To: <222mhz at mailman.qth.net>
> 
> Maybe ICOM 371. Module for FT736.
> 
> DEMI transverters probably work better.
> 
> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
> 
> On 10/30/2011 9:31 AM, Ted M wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> It appears there are no SSB 222 MHz radios being produced anymore.
>> Are there any plans by the big 3 amateur companies to build one.
>> 
>> I looked on eBAY and did not see any.
>> 
>> Does anyone in the group know the model of any of these SSB radios?
>> That way I can narrow my search.
>> 
>> Thanks and 73
>> Sincerely,
>> Ted
>> KB6UDA
>> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> 222mhz mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/222mhz
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:222mhz at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html