[160m] KU4XR running JASON Normal tonite on 160 meters

[scottw3tx at verizon.net]

Unsubscribe

Best regards,
Scott

On May 28, 2010, at 7:58 PM, "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk at earthlink.net> wrote:

> Some beacons have more to do with weak signal detection and long time
> integration decoding capabilities, such as JASON.  PSK31 is too  
> easy, from
> my experience, I would compare it to browsing the internet or  
> picking up the
> phone, nothing compared to JASON, WSPR, Part 15 operations and  
> various forms
> of QRSs.  What was the mode used for 5W 2m EME that took something  
> like a
> week to get a callsign out?  Not the same as tossing a callsign out on
> 146.52.
>
> Kurt
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock at centurytel.net>
>
> Andy- JASON looks cute, and may have some small advantages for weak  
> signals,
> but IMHO, I think your Beacon would be more effective if it used a  
> mode
> already in wide spread use, like PSK31, or its relatives.
> A beacon should be readily readable with common capabilities, not  
> rarely
> used ones. I did a Google search on JASON, and found NO references to
> software or radio in a long list of responses.  QED
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> 160m mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/160m
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:160m at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html