[160m] KU4XR running JASON Normal tonite on 160 meters
Tom Ed Moore(k5bm)
k5bm at swbell.net
Fri May 28 20:22:45 EDT 2010
Let's go for the future. Look foreward, not back. Here nothing but cw and
ssb but I welcome innovations.
Tom-k5bm
----- Original Message -----
From: "KD7JYK DM09" <kd7jyk at earthlink.net>
To: "'160 Meter list'" <160m at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [160m] KU4XR running JASON Normal tonite on 160 meters
Some beacons have more to do with weak signal detection and long time
integration decoding capabilities, such as JASON. PSK31 is too easy, from
my experience, I would compare it to browsing the internet or picking up the
phone, nothing compared to JASON, WSPR, Part 15 operations and various forms
of QRSs. What was the mode used for 5W 2m EME that took something like a
week to get a callsign out? Not the same as tossing a callsign out on
146.52.
Kurt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Aycock" <billaycock at centurytel.net>
Andy- JASON looks cute, and may have some small advantages for weak signals,
but IMHO, I think your Beacon would be more effective if it used a mode
already in wide spread use, like PSK31, or its relatives.
A beacon should be readily readable with common capabilities, not rarely
used ones. I did a Google search on JASON, and found NO references to
software or radio in a long list of responses. QED
______________________________________________________________
More information about the 160m
mailing list