[1000mp] U.S. Yaesu Ops Sent to Siberia
Bill Axelrod
bill at axelrods.org
Tue Apr 18 07:21:40 EDT 2006
This email is 17 days overdue. It would have been better received on 1
April.
Bill K3WA
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Rippey" <w3uls at 3n.net>
To: <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 10:17 PM
Subject: [1000mp] U.S. Yaesu Ops Sent to Siberia
>A recent petition the ARRL submitted to the Federal Communications
>Commission proposes that regulation of amateur radio spectrum henceforth
>be by bandwidth rather than mode. Assuming FCC approval, this will mean
>(according to the ARRL chart) that CW contesters with Yaesu rigs will have
>to operate on 40 meters from 7105 kHz to 7300 kHz, where a 3.5 kHz
>bandwidth is permitted. This is because only 500 Hz and 200 Hz bandwidth
>signals will be permitted from 7000 kHz to 7105. (That is, if I understand
>the proposal correctly.)
>
> As we know, unmodified MPs generate a CW bandwidth due to key clicks of
> well over 1 kHz, and even modified MPs are in the 800 Hz range. So there
> will be no way for MP owners to legally operate on the low end of 40,
> during a contest or at any other time. The ARRL has not obtained agreement
> from any other countries to go along, so basically Yaesu owners in the
> U.S. will be consigned to Siberia on 40 meters. They'll be able to contact
> each other, but that's about it. (The other HF bands would have similar
> restrictions, too.) Those high scores by U.S.contest stations will be a
> thing of the past.
>
> Some commenters assume the FCC (or the ARRL) will provide H-P spectrum
> analyzers for every ham in order to assure each ham's ability to comply
> with the new setup. Probably the comments are tongue in cheek, but they do
> provoke some thought. I can hear the arguments now as one ham reports that
> another's CW signal exceeds 500 Hz or whatever. HF operating could become
> quite contentious. Riley Hollingsworth will keep busy, for sure
>
> I wonder if I should sell my Mark V now? Maybe Yaesu can plead with the
> FCC for an exception, or maybe I'm missing something.
>
> 73,
> John, W3ULS
> ______________________________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>
More information about the 1000mp
mailing list