[1000mp] preference question

Jim W7RY w7ry at centurytel.net
Wed Mar 9 23:50:13 EST 2005


I concur.

That is why I sold my MK-v and now have a 1000MP. Also, take a look 
at  http://www.w8ji.com/receiver_tests.htm

Tom has some interesting information on the difference between the two.

73
Jim W7RY




At 11:16 AM 3/9/2005, George & Marijke Guerin wrote:
>Bruce, et. al.,
>
>I would take a late 1000MP not a Mark V.
>
>The filter selections is a lot easier and one can change selections from 
>the front panel without auxiliary programs.
>
>If I needed 200 watts I would look for a late model FT1000D - not a Mark V.
>
>73        George    K8GG
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Wade" <abcincowbay at ns.sympatico.ca>
>To: <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:13 AM
>Subject: [1000mp] preference question
>
>
>>I'm looking for opinions about the following:
>>Ifyou had the option of either a FT1000 MP, or an FT1000 MP Mark V, which 
>>would be the preferred radio to have ?
>>
>>rgds / Bruce / VE1NB
>>______________________________________________________________
>>1000mp mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>>Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>
>>_____________________________________________________
>>This message scanned for viruses by CoreComm
>>
>>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________
>1000mp mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net



More information about the 1000mp mailing list