[1000mp] FTDX9000D Review August QST

[D. J.]

On 02, Jul 2005, at 7:19, Bill Gode, Sr. wrote:

> Dave Sumner's comments in the FTDX9000D review were interesting
> when he said anything he could hear on the 9000D (during strong
> signal contesting conditions) could also be heard on his regular
> transceiver, adding that "pushing the performance envelope this far  
> will not
> make a difference very often."  W3IZ said signals "seemed sharper and
> crisper
> on the 9000D," but never said he was able to copy a signal on the  
> big Yaesu
> that he couldn't copy on his MP.  Worth an extra ten grand?  I  
> don't think
> so.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill, W9NHQ
>
>



The sharper audio difference might only be a couple of resistors and  
a capacitor in the audio amp section, hi...

Dale





> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "D. J." <dalej2 at mac.com>
> To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 7:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] FTDX9000D Review August QST
>
>
>
>>
>> I just quick scanned the numbers and I'm shocked.  My MKV for
>> difference in price dynamic range and mds ect are very similar.  My
>> Icom 775 does better than either.  The mighty 775 trumps the big boys
>> once again.
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>