[1000mp] Why??

William Shadid wa9mxq at att.net
Tue Aug 3 20:41:47 EDT 2004


I suspect that the MP is not up to the required level of stability and that
is the reason the Mark V and Mark V Field come standard with the TCXO. If
you need more details, I would suggest checking the stability requirements
for 60 meters and then compare the stability performance specifications of
the original, stock FT-1000MP.

I had an MP but moved to a Mark V so it is not an issue for me. My use of 60
meters has been on an older IC-751A because it has the optional TCXO.

73,

-Bill, WA9MXQ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Craig Spada" <caspada at adelphia.net>
To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, 03 August 2004 7:36 PM
Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??


> Yes they did, but the tcxo option is still available for the original 857
> like I have, but that does not answer the question that was asked earlier,
> is the frequency stability on the 1000MP without the tcxo legal on 60
> meters.
> Craig WA2TWF
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of William Shadid
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:28 PM
> To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] Why??
>
>
> Didn't Yaesu add the TCXO to radios designated as "D" models? Recall that
> all the new radios with 60 meters included now have the suffix "D" as part
> of their model name.
>
> 73,
>
> -Bill, WA9MXQ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike MacDonald" <mikemacd at erols.com>
> To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, 03 August 2004 7:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
>
>
> > Maybe so but then why is the 857 and 897 sold as
> > ready for 60M? I can understand the bw but TCXO
> > required??
> >
> > Mike WA2E
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Craig Spada
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:09 PM
> > To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
> > Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
> >
> >
> > Just so I am clear, are you stating my stock 1000MP will not be legal on
> 60
> > meters because of the frequency stability??, unless I purchase the
tcxo?.
> > Craig WA2TWF
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 1000mp mailing list
> > 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
> _______________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp



More information about the 1000mp mailing list