[1000mp] Logger/Rig Control for Mk V Field?
Jim Smith
[email protected]
Tue, 20 May 2003 11:49:53 -0700
I have used only 2 contest logging programs, WriteLog and TRLog. I got
WL for RTTY contesting. I far prefer TR and wouldn't consider using WL
for phone or cw contests.
To call CQ
WL - hit the CQ key (I think it's F2)
TR - hit the CQ key (F1 or F2, depending on which form of CQ you want
to send)
To send the Exchange
WL - hit the Exchange key (F3?)
TR - hit Enter
To sent TU QRZ
WL - hit the TU key (F4?)
TR - hit Enter
To log the Q
WL - hit Enter
TR - nothing to hit, it's already in the log.
In WL, as I recall, there is a yet a different key for the S&P exchange
because what you send is different. In TR guess what key you use. Yup,
it's the Enter key. See, you're learning already.
You will notice that I have difficulties remembering which key is which
in WL.
I have lost many, many QSOs using WL because I forgot to hit Enter to
log the Q.
WL enthusiasts tell me that they have simply trained themselves to hit
the right keys, including Enter to log the Q. Terrific, something that
requires more training and provides more opportunities to screw up is
considered a good thing.
Which one would you rather teach your FD crew to use?
They have also wondered why one would want to have the Q logged
automatically, presumably instead of reviewing it for approval and then
logging it. I wonder why anyone would want to review the log entry.
You made the Q so log it and get on with the next one. If you do
notice a mistake it's pretty easy to edit right then and there.
WL simply requires too many different keystrokes to make and log a Q.
This translates to more confusion, more errors, lower rate and lower score.
There are all kinds of WL users who will say they can complete a Q just
as fast as a TR user and I would believe them. Indeed, lots of WL users
make scores I can only dream about. Good for them, they have
demonstrated a higher level of skill than that needed by a TR user.
FD specific
Computer:
TR will run just fine on a 386. 386s are cheap. Outfitting a FD setup
with computers is, therefore, cheap.
Networking:
TR uses a networking scheme that only requires you to daisy-chain
computers via serial ports. No wondering about whether or not to use
NETBUI or... i.e. you don't have to know anything about computer
networking to set up TR for a multi-multi, which is what FD is.
I don't know how WL is networked, I presume through Windows in the usual
way.
Now, TR doesn't have all the bells and whistles that many Windows based
programs have, e.g. greyline maps. For FD you don't need them.
TR supports a very large number of contests, 75 the last time I counted.
It is very flexible so, if you want to use it for an unsupported
contest you can usually change the configuration to accomodate.
WL supports a number of contests, not sure how many. It appears to me
that it's pretty well unuseable for an unsupported contest until someone
writes a "module" for that contest. The documentation on how to write
these modules was incomprehensible to me the last time I looked at it.
Far more skilled programmers than I have sought assistance with this on
the WL reflector and finally seem to have given up.
TR has a cw simulator which will send calls to you at whatever speed you
choose so you can practise logging (and cw). It's just like being in a
contest (except no qrm). One can easily spend 2-3 hours at this,
watching your score pile up. Don't know if any other contest software
can do this.
Documentation
Both TR and WL could use better documentation. WL has fallen into the
trap of believing that a help file is the same as documentation. This
has caused someone to write his own and put it up on his web site for
all to use. Sorry, Scott, don't remember your call. I think it's
something9FOX. However, both are better than the Yaesu MkV
documentation, although not as fancy.
I think most serious contesters use a logging program optimized for
contesting and something else for general purpose logging, DXing,
tracking awards, printing QSLs and finding QSL managers.
These comments are coming from someone who does a lot of contesting and
has won a few CQ WPX/DX, ARRL DX etc for VE7. (Small frog in small
puddle) If you have nothing better to do, do a search for VE7FO in the
3830 reflector archives.
The FD version of TR is free at http://www.qth.com/tr/free.html
I hope this helps, Rich
73 de Jim Smith VE7FO
Rich McGee wrote:
> All;
> With Field Day rapidly coming up, I want to be as prepared as
> possible, and this includes finding the best logging program/rig
> control I can afford. While I've played with the demo copy of TRX-Man,
> and found it to be really nice, is there anything out there that
> people like better?
>
> Thanks!
> Rich de KY6O