[1000mp] Field RTTY Filters

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:46:46 -0500

Hans & Bill, 

I agree with both of you that the choices of 2.4, 2.0, 250H or 500H 
for RTTY is rather absurd of Yaesu, particularly when 2.0, 500H, 250H 
is available for CW.  Seems to be a real oversight in the firmware. 

I wonder if anyone has an "inside" contact to find out if it is 
possible to "fix" the problem.  I would consider giving up use of 
Nar2 in SSB and replacing 2.0 Khz filters with Inrad's 1.0 KHz 
filters for CW and digital operation ... if I could actually use 
the filters without resorting to external computer control.

73, 

   ... Joe, K4IK 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] Field RTTY Filters
> 
> 
> Hello Bill,
> 
> Yes, that would be the best choice!
> 
> I cannot find any reason why Yaesu changed this between the Technical
> Overview and the Manual. And why they did'nt change it on the Field
> afterwards.
> 
> 73,
> Hans Remeeus.
> 
> Ham Radio:
> PA1HR
> 
> Sites:
> www.remeeus.nl
> www.qsl.net/pa1hr
> 
> e-mail:
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Osborne, William P." <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:05 PM
> Subject: RE: [1000mp] Field RTTY Filters
> 
> 
> Thanks Hans, I will read page 28.  I agree this is  a mess; I 
> would have
> wanted 2.0, 500, 250 for the 3 choices.
> 
> 73 Bill, K5ZQ
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:02 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [1000mp] Field RTTY Filters
> >
> > Hello Bill,
> >
> > I presume that on this subject there is no difference 
> between the Mark
> V
> > and
> > the field.
> >
> > RTTY/PKT: NOR = 2.4k, NAR1 = 2.0k, NAR2 = 250H or 500H.
> >
> > (BTW, my choice would be: NOR = 2.0k, NAR1 = 500H, NAR2 = 250H, as
> > mentioned
> > in the Technical Overview of the Mark V!)
> >
> > The manual of the Mark V is not quite clear on this subject. On page
> 102,
> > 5-4, dAtAnAr2, it does not mention the 500H option. But on 
> page 28 it
> is
> > mentioned!
> >
> > 8.2: 8.2M = 250H, 455H = 500H.
> > 455: 8.2M = 500H, 455H = 250H.
> > 8.2-455: 8.2M and 455H = 250H.
> > 500H: 8.2M and 455H = 500H.
> >
> > This would be it. Please correct me if I am wrong.
> >
> > 73,
> > Hans Remeeus.
> >
> > Ham Radio:
> > PA1HR
> >
> > Sites:
> > www.remeeus.nl
> > www.qsl.net/pa1hr
> >
> > e-mail:
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Osborne, William P." <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:34 AM
> > Subject: [1000mp] Field RTTY Filters
> >
> >
> > I am trying to set the Bwidth for Nar2 in RTTY. The manual 
> talks about
> > 455,
> > 8.2 and 8.2-455, but the radio also has a 500H mode, what is this?
> > Thanks Bill, K5ZQ
> > _______________________________________________
> > List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> > 1000mp mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> > 1000mp mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> _______________________________________________
> List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> 1000mp mailing list
> [email protected]
> To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> 1000mp mailing list
> [email protected]
> To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> 