[1000mp] 1000-Field Review ... Notice what's MISSING?

Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:49:43 -0400

> Anyone else notice that the receiver 5 kHz spacing tests are
> indeed MISSING from the QST review ? 

Yes, they did notice!  This was an oversight on ARRL's part.  They just
corrected this on the web page, so you can download a new copy of the review
that contains the 5-kHz spacing.

http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0208.pdf

It was just caught on time with the printer, so the printed review will be
the same as the updated page.

73, 
Ed Hare, W1RFI
ARRL Lab
225 Main St
Newington, CT 06111
Tel: 860-594-0318
Internet: [email protected]
Web: http://www.arrl.org/tis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Billy Cox [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [1000mp] 1000-Field Review ... Notice what's MISSING?
> 
> 
> Anyone else notice that the receiver 5 kHz spacing tests are
> indeed MISSING from the QST review ? 
> 
> The 5 kHz spacing dynamic range or third order intercept 
> numbers tend to show the more critical performance of the 
> receiver under heavy QRM conditions ... Yet where are the
> measurements ?
> 
> The ARRL had stated they were moving from the 20 kHz to the 
> more useful (and accurate) 5 kHz spacing measurements ...
> 
> So "where's the beef" ?
> 
> 73 Billy AA4NU
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> 1000mp mailing list
> [email protected]
> To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> 