[Yaesu] FT890 vs FT900
Augie (Gus) Hansen
augie.hansen at comcast.net
Wed Jul 12 11:13:27 EDT 2006
John Geiger wrote:
> Other than the remotable faceplate, are there any
> other major differences between the FT890 and FT900?
>
> 73s John W5TD
>
>
I've had both rigs. They are almost identical (case size, internal
circuitry, ATU if installed). The FT-900 adds direct band-selection
buttons on the base unit (they are not accessible when you remote the
head, of course).
The display quality was a big consideration for me. The FT-890 display
is fine for use in the shack, but it washes out easily in even low light
levels. I found it mostly unusable in portable/mobile situations,
especially here in the bright Colorado sunshine. The FT-900 display is
clearly visible day and night under all lighting conditions. Both radios
have good receivers and good audio on both RX and TX.
I sold the FT-890 and kept the FT-900 for backup and portable use. The
detachable head is certainly a plus for mobile installations, although
I've never used mine mobile (I use an IC-706MKIIG for that because of
the VHF/UHF coverage).
Gus Hansen
KB0YH
More information about the Yaesu
mailing list