[Yaesu] Mechanical vs. Crystal filters
Walt Hutchens
waltah at earthlink.net
Sun Aug 20 23:20:31 EDT 2006
I'm not a guru either but I'll take a stab anyway, and maybe one of
the gurus will correct any errors.
Crystals have extremely high Q's. All you've got is a quartz
crystal displaying piezo-electric properties -- a crystal lattice and
an electrostatic field. Where are the losses? Some in the plated
on electrodes and the mounting, some, doubtless in whatever gas
surrounds the crystal ... TINY.
The elements of a mechanical filter are good but not THAT good.
You've got those coils ... UGH -- coils have resistance, meaning
losses. And the filter elements themselves aren't a single crystal --
there's bound to be some loss in a vibrating polycrystaline solid.
So for a given number of elements, the crystal filter should have
both lower losses and a better aspect ratio. Plus the many possible
modes of vibration that can be excited in a crystal allows their use
in a filter at any practical frequency. Mechanical filters are much
more limited, frequency-wise.
So why mechanical filters at all? Well, at the time Collins made
them popular, most radios achieved selectivity in an IF at under 1
Mcs -- typically 455 kcs. I believe that it was cheaper to build a
five or six element mechanical filter for these frequencies than make
the five or six crystals necessary for the crystal filter. Plus, at
least some parts of the mechanical filter could be patented, where
crystal filters using individual crystals were in the public domain.
Today, the situation is probably somewhat different. Crystal
filters can be built on a single crystal and the process is highly
automated. Mechanical filters are still a hand assembled item.
However, 'Collins mechanical filter' has something of a cachet.
What I fail to understand is why any modern radio has a 455 kcs IF.
Could it be just the fact that every frequency determining part you
can imagine is made for that IF, so parts are cheap?
I guess there are more tidy frequency conversion schemes available if
the final IF (that is, the largest signals in the receiver) is well
below the lowest frequency at the antenna. But all those mixers ...
UGH.
Walt Hutchens
KJ4KV
More information about the Yaesu
mailing list