[Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
Steve Jones
[email protected]
Sat, 16 Feb 2002 21:13:49 -0500
Oops Bill you should apologize again for your behavior as my E-mail picked
up a reply where you again acted childish and it was not to my behavior that
caused this, it is in response to the fact you and ONE other ham on this
reflector attacked me and I responded in kind. As the saying goes, if you
can't take it, don't dish it out and also when someone ask for feedback on a
subject. Stick to the subject and don't try and force your opinions that had
nothing to do with the request on others. By the way your E-mail went into
the deleted file where it belongs and please just hit you delete button if
you don't like what folks say as that is what I will do with you and the
other parties mail when I see it again and grow up!
Enough is enough and thank you to those who responded to the subject off the
reflector as like me, they could see we have some who are easily offended if
you don't like the Icom Pro. I appreciate the good tips and 73, Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Martin - K4SGF" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
> I must also apologize to the reflector for my earlier email lightly
> criticizing someone's childish behavior. That was inappropriate and I
will
> make it a point to refrain from such in the future.
>
> 73 de Bill K4SGF
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian Eller
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 4:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
>
>
> ENOUGH!!! SUBJECT CLOSED!!! NEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
>
>
> > Van, Please get back to the request subject, feedback of how to improve
> the
> > already great FT1000D with mods and filters. That is the subject, not
Icom
> > verses Yaesu, I never asked for that. Would welcome and have enjoyed
those
> > Reponses so far, not attacks and insults. 73, Steve
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "van lincoln wd8aam" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 5:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
> >
> >
> > > I think Brian gave you some 'real feedback', its up to
> > > you to see it.
> > > van
> > >
> > > At 04:52 PM 2/16/02 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >Good Brian, now do you have any real feedback to the subject asked.
> > FT1000
> > > >radios. That is the subject, not what someone else said about
something
> > that
> > > >should be discussed on the Icom reflector. Thank you...
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Brian Eller" <[email protected]>
> > > >To: <[email protected]>
> > > >Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:41 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Oops, Murphy is alive and well... I don't know what I hit to send
> that
> > as
> > > >I
> > > >> was typing; I guess it just proves I'm human like everybody else...
> > > >anyhow,
> > > >> as I was starting to say, I read what John said:
> > > >>
> > > >> "When you compare receiver audio the Pro wins hands down. The pro
has
> > the
> > > >> ability to hear from 100 to 3.6k ....... the FT- 1000 has narrow
ssb
> > > >> crystal filters that are setup for contesters and are about 2.3k
wide
> > > >total
> > > >> with an effective audio response of only 300 to 2.6k at the -6db
> points
> > on
> > > >> Xmit or receive depending on the carrier point alignment on that
> > > >particular
> > > >> rig...I have had a measured both and the Icom has superior fidelity
> !!!
> > > >> You need to learn how to use the pro's digital filter !! And that
is
> > > >coming
> > > >> from a loyal yaesu man
> > > >>
> > > >> 73's John"
> > > >>
> > > >> I've read this several times, and I don't see an attack there. I
> guess
> > > >it's
> > > >> certainly possible that different people can/will take the same
> > statement
> > > >> different ways, but myself, I didn't interpret anything said there
as
> a
> > > >> flame.
> > > >>
> > > >> One of the things that really attracted me to Ham Radio was the
> > friendly,
> > > >> helpful attitude of other hams. Myself, John's statement about
> learning
> > > >the
> > > >> digital filters was an attempt to help you improve the performance
of
> > your
> > > >> radio, not to flame you... but, as we've both said, we need to drop
> > this
> > > >> subject, and get on with the purpose of this reflector, so I'll
step
> > off
> > > >my
> > > >> soapbox.
> > > >>
> > > >> 73's to all,
> > > >>
> > > >> -= Brian
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
> > > >> To: <[email protected]>
> > > >> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 1:26 PM
> > > >> Subject: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > response to John Bolduc but I do not appreciate personal attacks
> and
> > I
> > > >> > should have looked for his E-mail address to respond instead of
the
> > > >> > reflector. It will not happen again and again I apologize for how
I
> > did
> > > >> it,
> > > >> > not what I said. Let's get back to the subject and request which
> was
> > > >about
> > > >> > Yaesu, not Icom radios. Thanks and 73, Steve, NX1G
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Have a great day, because if you don't someone else will!!!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 73, Steve, NX1G
> > > >> >
> > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > >> > Yaesu mailing list
> > > >> > [email protected]
> > > >> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Yaesu mailing list
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Yaesu mailing list
> > > >[email protected]
> > > >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Yaesu mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Yaesu mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yaesu mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yaesu mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>