[Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...

[Steve Jones]

Van, Please get back to the request subject, feedback of how to improve the
already great FT1000D with mods and filters. That is the subject, not Icom
verses Yaesu, I never asked for that. Would welcome and have enjoyed those
Reponses so far, not attacks and insults. 73, Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "van lincoln wd8aam" <vlincoln@earthlink.net>
To: <yaesu@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...


> I think Brian gave you some 'real feedback', its up to
> you to see it.
> van
>
> At 04:52 PM 2/16/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >Good Brian, now do you have any real feedback to the subject asked.
FT1000
> >radios. That is the subject, not what someone else said about something
that
> >should be discussed on the Icom reflector. Thank you...
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Brian Eller" <b.eller@gte.net>
> >To: <yaesu@mailman.qth.net>
> >Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:41 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
> >
> >
> >> Oops, Murphy is alive and well... I don't know what I hit to send that
as
> >I
> >> was typing; I guess it just proves I'm human like everybody else...
> >anyhow,
> >> as I was starting to say, I read what John said:
> >>
> >> "When you compare receiver audio the Pro wins hands down. The pro has
the
> >> ability to hear from 100 to 3.6k  ....... the FT- 1000 has narrow ssb
> >> crystal filters that are setup for contesters and are about 2.3k wide
> >total
> >> with an effective audio response of only 300 to 2.6k at the -6db points
on
> >> Xmit or receive depending on the carrier point alignment on that
> >particular
> >> rig...I have had a measured both and the Icom has superior fidelity !!!
> >> You need to learn how to use the pro's digital filter !! And that is
> >coming
> >> from a loyal yaesu man
> >>
> >>  73's John"
> >>
> >> I've read this several times, and I don't see an attack there. I guess
> >it's
> >> certainly possible that different people can/will take the same
statement
> >> different ways, but myself, I didn't interpret anything said there as a
> >> flame.
> >>
> >> One of the things that really attracted me to Ham Radio was the
friendly,
> >> helpful attitude of other hams. Myself, John's statement about learning
> >the
> >> digital filters was an attempt to help you improve the performance of
your
> >> radio, not to flame you... but, as we've both said, we need to drop
this
> >> subject, and get on with the purpose of this reflector, so I'll step
off
> >my
> >> soapbox.
> >>
> >> 73's to all,
> >>
> >> -= Brian
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Steve Jones" <nx1g@rev.net>
> >> To: <yaesu@mailman.qth.net>
> >> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 1:26 PM
> >> Subject: [Yaesu] I apologize to the reflector for my...
> >>
> >>
> >> > response to John Bolduc but I do not appreciate personal attacks and
I
> >> > should have looked for his E-mail address to respond instead of the
> >> > reflector. It will not happen again and again I apologize for how I
did
> >> it,
> >> > not what I said. Let's get back to the subject and request which was
> >about
> >> > Yaesu, not Icom radios. Thanks and 73, Steve, NX1G
> >> >
> >> > Have a great day, because if you don't someone else will!!!
> >> >
> >> > 73, Steve, NX1G
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Yaesu mailing list
> >> > Yaesu@mailman.qth.net
> >> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Yaesu mailing list
> >> Yaesu@mailman.qth.net
> >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Yaesu mailing list
> >Yaesu@mailman.qth.net
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Yaesu mailing list
> Yaesu@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>