[Vintage-Audio]V40#15- BIG Wire
wolfbob
wolfbob at csnsys.com
Thu Nov 29 23:13:11 EST 2007
I'll admit to it. I had my own 4 block coverage on 690KHz
and played 78 RPMs, mostly Big Band Jazz.
I was 12 or so at the time.
WBob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duane Fischer, W8DBF" <dfischer at usol.com>
To: "Vintage home and professional audio equipment from 1975
back" <vintage-audio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Vintage-Audio]V40#15- BIG Wire
> Hey Michael,
>
> Remember when most of us found some empty soup or
> vegetable cans in the trash can, rinsed them out, used a
> hammer and nail to punch a hole in the bottom, stuck a
> string through the hole, put a small washer on the end of
> the string and tied a knot to keep it from coming off ...
> Did the same on the other end of that non-conductive
> telephone wire and had our secret phones from one bunker
> bush to another? At least 'our' telephone company did not
> keep increasing the rates!
>
> What was a little bit scary was when we really thought we
> did hear a faint far off voice answer us!
>
> I wonder how many on this list would admit to building a
> 100 milliwatt transmitter and playing 45 rpm singles over
> the air as they had visions of being a DJ dancing in the
> canyons of their minds?
>
>
>
> Duane Fischer, W8DBF/WPE8CXO
> dfischer at usol.com
> HHI: Halligan's Hallicrafters International
> http://www.w9wze.net
> HHRP: Historic Halligan Radio Project
> hhrp.w9wze.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "michael salmons" <salmonsm at missouri.edu>
> To: "Vintage home and professional audio equipment from
> 1975 back" <vintage-audio at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 7:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vintage-Audio]V40#15- BIG Wire
>
>
>>
>> I've already let the cat out fo the bag regarding my
>> slack attitude toward wire... but I can say I have used
>> coax for speaker wire before and found it to be
>> perfectly satisfactory.
>>
>> Then again, I use LAMPCORD <roll eyes>...
>>
>> Just joshin.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:20 PM, Phil Barnes-Roberts WA6DZS
>> wrote:
>>
>>> vintage-audio-request at mailman.qth.net opined on
>>> 11/28/2007 01:03 AM:
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ---
>>>> Subject: Re: [Vintage-Audio] Re Speaker Wire Options
>>>> From: "wolfbob" <wolfbob at csnsys.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:29:40 -0800
>>>> To: "Vintage home and professional audio equipment from
>>>> 1975 back" <vintage-audio at mailman.qth.net>
>>>> Duane.
>>>> I said it before and will always say it. USE BIG WIRE.
>>>> Think of Ohms Law a minute. If you are running 20
>>>> watts into what is probably 4 ohms (at 50-100 Hz into
>>>> a big speaker. They are 8 ohms or so at 1000Hz) you
>>>> will have about 9 volts across the speaker and will be
>>>> drawing about 2.5 amps. Now if your speaker wire has
>>>> 0.5 ohm of resistance you will loose 1.25 volts or
>>>> about 2 dB of bass. You can easily hear this loss. If
>>>> you don't believe me run your #24+ wire and in
>>>> parallel run some #14 or #12 and do an A/B test and
>>>> play your bass singer. He will fade into the
>>>> background. I have #14 speaker wire ala RS running to
>>>> all my speakers. Things get much worse if you are
>>>> punching those JBLs with some real peaks. They just
>>>> won't be peaks anymore as the IR losses eat away your
>>>> great audio.
>>>> WBob
>>> Hi, Guys (&Gals)--
>>>
>>> Not having run across #24 'Speed Wire' I'll have to pass
>>> on it; sounds like phone-closet twisted-pair stuff,
>>> though, or doorbell wire. Light. Way light.
>>>
>>> You've reminded me of something K8EBR, Tom Pierce told
>>> me one day in the EMC Lab at JPL, that agrees with Bob.
>>>
>>> If you really want 8-ohm-impedance pair wire, get some
>>> (surplus?) RG-11/U coax (stored indoors is best, so
>>> we'll hope it's uncontaminated with the jacket
>>> plasticizers after years in the sun, or on the shelf).
>>>
>>> Ignore the center conductor, and tie-wrap two pieces of
>>> this half- inch-or-so coax together along their length.
>>> That size conductor, jacket and spacing is supposed to
>>> come out to eight ohms. Twisting together (obviously,
>>> not very tight) helps cancel out fields over the length
>>> of the run - with any pair.
>>>
>>> You'd probably have to skin back jackets and braids,
>>> remove some center conductor and inner poly insulation,
>>> and twist the two stranded braids into a pair for your
>>> connections. A monster indeed! Anybody hear this one
>>> before?
>>>
>>> --
>>> '---O=o=O---'
>>> 73, Phil Barnes-Roberts WA6DZS < Mailto:pbarnrob at acm
>>> dot org >
>>> "When you are trying to get a handle on a big decision,
>>> try looking
>>> at it like this; 'What kind of world do I want to live
>>> in?'"
>>> --Ann Bodenhamer Martin, author of /Calico/ /Families/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Home:
>>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/vintage-audio
>>> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
>>> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Home:
>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/vintage-audio
>> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
>> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus
>> Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date: 11/27/2007 8:30
>> PM
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/vintage-audio
> List Administrator: Duane Fischer, W8DBF
> ** For Assistance: dfischer at usol.com **
>
More information about the Vintage-Audio
mailing list