Today I received three more EQSLs for a total of 15 (one was actually an email QSL). I was very disappointed by LOTW, which showed only one QSL related to the FQP. Ironically this was from the same station whose call sign I misspelled (I placed an”I” instead of a “J”). Perhaps Hiram Maxim is punishing me. Interestingly, I did receive one QSL from QRZ for a station in Denmark.  Thus my receive percentage is now 16.7% and my error rate is down to 6.3%.<div dir="auto">I am very surprised that stations are using eQSL at a much higher rate than LOTW, when LOTW is essentially free and eQSL is up to a few dollars a month depending on what level you are.</div><div dir="auto">I looked up all the DX stations on QRZ and I am sending out seven bureau cards to those stations that stated that they respond to bureau. I have received EQSLs from several Canadian and other DX stations already.</div><div dir="auto">Several stations do not list their QSL protocol on QRZ. I have noted them and actually received some EQSLs from them both domestic and DX.</div><div dir="auto">As an interesting sidenote, I did receive an EQSL from a station that I had previously worked from California 16 years ago. He is still at the same address. Only one is from a person that I have work since moving to Florida. That’s a station in the Virgin Islands.</div><div dir="auto">Note that these comments are mainly based on the received QSLs. The remainder of the 109 QSOs have not really been looked at. </div><div dir="auto">Mike.</div><div dir="auto">K6UMO </div>