[TVARC] good qso or not

[Wayne N4FP]

It looks good to me. Log it. The message can count as the QSL as far as I
am concerned
Wayne

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024, 6:53 PM John Ellis <john.np2b at gmail.com> wrote:

> Pete,et.al,
>
> Today I worked a station in Iran.
> One problem, he doesn't send
> RR73. He doesn't send RR73
> to anyone. Your only confirmation
> is in his log or getting a QSL from
> his QSL manager.
>
> I sent him an e-mail and he actually
> confirmed the QSO directly with
> me with a valid time and date. So
> there is no question that I am in his
> log since he confirmed the qso with
> me directly via e-mail,
>
> Since he is in my log and I have
> confirmation that I am in his, even
> though I did not receive a direct
> RRR or RR73, should that really
> count as a valid QSO?
>
> I have not counted it as a valid
> QSO yet, pending a ruling from
> the "rules committee." What do
> you all think?
>
> 73,
> John, NP2B
>
>
> --
>
> John Ellis         (NP2B)
> 1149 Mockingbird Lane
> The Villages, FL 32163
>
> telephone 352 633-2910
> facsimile  352 633-0401
> mobile     340 513-4928
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Virus-free.www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_-8070314605490057795_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> ______________________________________________________________
> TVARC mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/tvarc
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:TVARC at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/tvarc/attachments/20240414/a2e65bf2/attachment.html>