[TVARC] Fwd: FCC Fee Opposition - now is the time!

Sat Oct 17 17:06:03 EDT 2020

Hi Members of TVARC’s MailList,

If you’re interested in trying to stop the FCC’s proposed hike in amateur radio licensing fees, now’s the time to submit your comments to the FCC.  See the ARRL’s email below for more details.

Stay safe from COVID-19.

73,
Tony/K4QR

Regards,

Tony Hackenberg
Email: tonyhackenberg at iCloud.com
Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

> From: ARRL Members Only Web site <memberlist at www.arrl.org>
> Date: October 17, 2020 at 10:51:08 EDT
> To: tonyhackenberg at icloud.com
> Subject: FCC Fee Opposition - now is the time!
> 
> The amateur radio fee proposal has been published in the Federal
> Register.
> 
> https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/10/15/2020-21530/schedule-of-application-fees
> 
> Now that it is published, it is time to comment on the FCC website:
> 
> https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=20-270
> 
> AND, if you wish, reference the Federal Register, and send your comments
> to your elected representatives and the President.
> 
> THERE ARE FEWER THAN 30 DAYS TO COMMENT. PLEASE DO THIS NOW!
> 
> The Priority is getting comments filed with the FCC.
> 
> 
> ARRL Washington Counsel David Siddall, K3ZJ, has suggested the following
> arguments
> 
> 
> Arguments Against FCC Fees for Radio Amateurs
> 
> 1. Amateurs contribute to the public good. In many areas they provide an
> emergency communications backbone capability at no taxpayer cost. 
> Consistently we have witnessed storms and natural disasters completely
> wipe out internet, cellular, and other means of communication.  Radio
> amateurs often fill that void on an unmatched, flexible basis when
> needed.  One recent example is the California wildfires.  
> 
> 2. Unlike operators in other FCC licensed services, Amateur Radio
> operators by law – domestic and international -- must eschew using
> their license for any pecuniary interest.  Amateurs are prohibited from
> earning or charging any money for any communications activity.  The
> expenses for their equipment and activities come out of their own
> pockets, with no opportunity for reimbursement or payment of any kind.
> 
> 3. The United States is experiencing a severe lack of RF engineers and
> expertise at the very time it is needed by the burgeoning wireless
> industries.    Amateur radio is helping to meet the deficit, but much
> more is needed and youngsters (High School and College-aged) are least
> able to afford licensing fees.  RF knowledge and related digital
> expertise is needed to maintain U.S. leadership in wireless industries. 
> At a minimum, young people (below the age of 26) should be exempt from
> the proposed license fees.
> 
> 4. Amateur radio is self-regulating.  (a) Amateur examinations are
> written and administered by radio amateur volunteers.  (b) Examination
> results and paperwork most often are submitted electronically to the
> FCC.  Electronic submission could be required if there would be a cost
> savings to the Commission. (c) Amateur radio educational classes are
> conducted by volunteers who by-and-large do not charge fees or tuition
> for teaching.  (d) The amateur service, in cooperation with the FCC’s
> Enforcement Bureau, has a volunteer corp that monitors the amateur
> airwaves and has programs that try to prevent their misuse before FCC
> involvement might be needed.  The amateurs also observe non-amateur
> signals both within amateur spectrum and outside it, and report unusual
> or suspicious signals.
> 
> 5. Amateur radio continues to be a source of significant technological
> innovation that should be encouraged, not discouraged. 
> 
> Some Suggestions
> 
> I do not recommend arguing that the $50. fee every 10 years, which
> amounts to $5.00 a year, will “kill” amateur radio, even though as
> proposed this is for each covered application, which includes upgrade
> applications.  Tech-General-Extra  could be $150. if exams taken at
> different sessions, a substantial amount.  But it “rings” the wrong
> way to say the whole service turns on $5./year for each licensee. If
> that’s all it would take ….
> 
> The Commission argues that the charges are required by the statute.  The
> word used is “shall”, which is mandatory, not optional.  But the
> statute does not set the amount, nor does it prohibit reasonable
> exceptions – evidenced by the Commission’s proposal to exempt from
> fees administrative update applications based on policy grounds.
> 
> This is not “aimed at amateur radio to kill it.”  There is a long
> history and precedent on charging fees for the licensing service
> involved, just as there is for passports, green cards, drivers licenses
> (issued by states), etc.  Better to make pertinent arguments on why the
> fees would impair the public benefits of the amateur radio service than
> argue that the whole service might die as a result of a fee that, in
> fact, is less than the fee many of us paid in the 1960’s and 1970’s,
> including myself as a struggling high school and college student (if
> adjusted for inflation).
> 
> For background: this proceeding is being handled by staff unfamiliar
> with amateur radio.  It is being handled in the FCC’s Office of
> Managing Director (OMD), not in the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
> where the amateur-specific Part 97 matters are handled.  The focus of
> OMD is accounting – budgets and the like for the entire Commission. 
> The fee proposals cover every FCC license and service across the board
> and the consideration was directed by Congress.  I recommend keeping
> “ham jargon” out of comments, it won’t be understood by the
> intended recipients.”
> 
> 73,
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> ARRL Southeastern Division
> Director: Mickey V Baker, N4MB
> n4mb at arrl.org
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> To unsubscribe from messages, go to:
> http://p1k.arrl.org/oo/b4631ea4ede27922fb648ab5e14cb750
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/tvarc/attachments/20201017/bad5f739/attachment-0001.html>