[Trunkcom] MultiNet

[Brian J Cathcart]

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 20:04:18 -0500 (EST) JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON
<at649@tcnet.org> writes:
> Also, like many EDACS systems I haven't heard too many good 
> things about LTR.  Of course Chester County, PA's system has had some 
> problems from what I've heard, and  so has Martin County, Florida

Everyone, let's keep this straight, you are confusing LTR and Multi-Net,
they are two different animals.  The systems getting complaints are
MULTI-NET, not LTR.  martin County, Fl and Chester County, PA are
MULTI-NET systems, not LTR.


>  What customers are there that are actually  happy with their LTR
systems?

Almost everyone I've talked to.  LTR is used by businesses and it is a
good, simple, and inexpensive way to trunk.  And it is very reliable.

--

The Scanner Dude
Brian J. Cathcart - KE4PMJ
South Florida Trunking Guide - 5th Edition (On CD-ROM too!)
Palm Beach County Frequency Directory - 4th Edition (On CD-ROM too!)